Launched October 27, 2026
Staxa

Staxa

Dedicated Multi-tenant deployments, isolated at the Kubernetes namespace level.

SubscriptionDevOpsCodeHosting645 impressions#44 of its week4 comments

Comments

>log in to comment
  • Aditya Goel· 17d ago

    An isolated app, database and subdomain per customer, each in its own namespace, is a concrete answer to the single-tenant question. Are users moving off a shared multi-tenant setup, or starting single-tenant from day one? Search note: I googled "deploy separate app instance per customer saas" (Google, US settings). Page 1 is mostly architecture guides (Launchpad, Microsoft, WorkOS, AWS, Clerk), plus a Reddit thread on multi-tenant vs one instance per client and a Fly.io community question. No product page owns it, and Staxa isn't there yet. I run AI Knows Us, so this kind of search check is what I do.

  • Jonathan[maker]· 21d ago

    Hello DevHunt community! I built Staxa to give your customers their own isolated app, database, subdomain and SSL, all managed per‑tenant in a dedicated Kubernetes namespace. You can spin up a tenant from the dashboard or from the management API, and the free tier includes two tenants. Would love your thoughts 😊

    • Fatisco Stack Industries· 10d ago

      Namespace isolation keeps tenants apart at the API level, but they still share the same nodes and kernel — when you need to upgrade the cluster itself, do tenants get moved one at a time, or can a bad node drain take several down together?

    • Jonathan[maker]· 9d ago

      Hey, sorry about the late reply I just got a chance to get to this. The honest answer is that it depends on the layer. Staxa runs on a single node right now, and it's a deliberate choice. At current load, a multi-node HA cluster would be paying for redundancy before there’s traffic to justify it, so maintenance today is a short scheduled window that affects every tenant at once. The tenant model was built so that changes with capacity, not a redesign, and the plan to get there is written down. What limits the impact on the shared kernel today: each tenant gets its own namespace with a ResourceQuota, Pod Security baseline enforcement, default-deny NetworkPolicies (tenants can’t reach each other or private ranges), no service-account tokens in tenant pods, and builds run in a separate locked-down namespace. A noisy tenant can’t starve the others, but a node event is still shared. When usage warrants it: - Cordon, then roll instead of evict. Tenant Deployments already roll with maxSurge 1 / maxUnavailable 0, so after cordoning a node, a rolling restart brings each replacement up elsewhere before the old pod stops. Even single-replica apps move without downtime, one node at a time. - Topology spread so a tenant’s services don’t all land on the same node. - Tenant databases on network-attached volumes instead of node-local disk, so they can follow their pod. That’s the main piece of work, and it’s scoped. Stronger kernel isolation (gVisor or Kata) as an opt-in for tenants who need it. Happy to go deeper if you're interested.

App, database, subdomain and SSL for each tenant, isolated at the Kubernetes namespace level. Provision from a dashboard or with one API call. Start free with 2 tenants. App, database, subdomain and SSL for each tenant, isolated at the Kubernetes namespace level. Provision from a dashboard, or with one API call. The pieces every dedicated environment needs, already wired together. Network policies and resource quotas per customer. One spike never reaches another tenant. Every dashboard action is an API call. Provision tenants from signup or CI/CD. A five-step wizard from repo to running tenant. No terminal, no YAML. A subdomain on day one; bring a custom domain and the certificate provisions itself. Apply config without a rebuild, ship the branch tip, or return to any past release.

More DevOps tools →74 free dev tools →

  • App, database, subdomain and SSL per tenant, isolated by Kubernetes namespace
  • Provision tenants via one‑click wizard or single API call
  • Namespace per tenant with network policies and resource quotas
  • Live build logs streamed and retained for each deployment
  • Automatic framework detection for 35+ templates

Staxa provides isolated multi-tenant environments with app, database, subdomain and SSL per customer on Kubernetes.

for
SaaS founders, agencies, freelancers, and platform engineers needing per-tenant isolation.
pricing
freemium
works withNext.jsReactViteDjangoFlaskRailsExpressNestJSFastAPIGoLaravelSpring BootDockerfile

Key features

6 features of Staxa
  • Namespace per tenant — Each tenant runs in its own Kubernetes namespace with network policies and resource quotas.
  • One-click provisioning — Create tenants via a dashboard wizard or a single API call, no YAML required.
  • Automatic domains & SSL — Subdomains are provided on day one and custom domains get auto-provisioned certificates.
  • Live build logs — Stream and retain logs for every build stage in the dashboard.
  • Rollback & redeploy — Apply config changes, ship new code or revert to any past release without rebuilding.
  • Template support — 35+ starter templates in 9 languages, auto-detecting frameworks like Next.js, Django, Rails, etc.

Use cases

  • Provision a dedicated environment for each new SaaS customer automatically on signup.
  • Give each agency client an isolated staging site with its own domain and SSL.
  • Create on-demand dev or test environments for internal teams without exposing kubectl.

Staxa vs alternatives

StaxaRailwayVercelRenderFirebase
Best forIsolated per-tenant stacks on KubernetesGeneral app deploymentFrontend deploymentsManaged app hostingServerless backend services
PricingFreemiumSubscriptionSubscriptionSubscriptionSubscription
DevHunt upvotes20000
LaunchedOct 2026————
  • Staxa vs Railway: Railway deploys apps and databases but does not provide per-tenant namespace isolation.
  • Staxa vs Vercel: Vercel focuses on frontend hosting, lacking built-in multi-tenant database and namespace isolation.
  • Staxa vs Render: Render offers managed hosting but does not give each tenant its own Kubernetes namespace.
  • Staxa vs Firebase: Firebase provides backend services but not isolated per-tenant Kubernetes environments.

Staxa FAQ

What is Staxa?+

Staxa is a multi-tenant infrastructure platform that gives each customer its own app, database, subdomain and SSL, isolated in a Kubernetes namespace.

Do I need to know Kubernetes?+

No. Staxa’s dashboard and API let you provision and manage tenants without using kubectl.

What frameworks are supported?+

It auto-detects frameworks such as Next.js, React, Vite, Django, Flask, Rails, Express, NestJS, FastAPI, Go and more, and any Dockerfile-based app.

Is there a free plan?+

Yes. The free sandbox plan includes 2 tenants with up to 2 services each; custom domains require a paid plan.

How are extra tenants priced?+

Extra tenants cost $8 per month on Starter, $7 on Growth, and $5 on Scale.

Summarized by DevHunt from staxa.dev · Oct 23, 2026. Details may change; check the official site.