Comments
>log in to commentHello DevHunt community! I built Staxa to give your customers their own isolated app, database, subdomain and SSL, all managed per‑tenant in a dedicated Kubernetes namespace. You can spin up a tenant from the dashboard or from the management API, and the free tier includes two tenants. Would love your thoughts 😊
- App, database, subdomain and SSL per tenant, isolated by Kubernetes namespace
- Provision tenants via one‑click wizard or single API call
- Namespace per tenant with network policies and resource quotas
- Live build logs streamed and retained for each deployment
- Automatic framework detection for 35+ templates
Staxa provides isolated multi-tenant environments with app, database, subdomain and SSL per customer on Kubernetes.
- for
- SaaS founders, agencies, freelancers, and platform engineers needing per-tenant isolation.
- pricing
- freemium
Key features
- Namespace per tenant — Each tenant runs in its own Kubernetes namespace with network policies and resource quotas.
- One-click provisioning — Create tenants via a dashboard wizard or a single API call, no YAML required.
- Automatic domains & SSL — Subdomains are provided on day one and custom domains get auto-provisioned certificates.
- Live build logs — Stream and retain logs for every build stage in the dashboard.
- Rollback & redeploy — Apply config changes, ship new code or revert to any past release without rebuilding.
- Template support — 35+ starter templates in 9 languages, auto-detecting frameworks like Next.js, Django, Rails, etc.
Use cases
- Provision a dedicated environment for each new SaaS customer automatically on signup.
- Give each agency client an isolated staging site with its own domain and SSL.
- Create on-demand dev or test environments for internal teams without exposing kubectl.
Staxa vs alternatives
 Staxa |  Railway |  Vercel |  Render |  Firebase | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Isolated per-tenant stacks on Kubernetes | General app deployment | Frontend deployments | Managed app hosting | Serverless backend services |
| Pricing | Freemium | Subscription | Subscription | Subscription | Subscription |
| DevHunt upvotes | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Launched | Oct 2026 | — | — | — | — |
- Staxa vs Railway: Railway deploys apps and databases but does not provide per-tenant namespace isolation.
- Staxa vs Vercel: Vercel focuses on frontend hosting, lacking built-in multi-tenant database and namespace isolation.
- Staxa vs Render: Render offers managed hosting but does not give each tenant its own Kubernetes namespace.
- Staxa vs Firebase: Firebase provides backend services but not isolated per-tenant Kubernetes environments.
Staxa FAQ
What is Staxa?+
Staxa is a multi-tenant infrastructure platform that gives each customer its own app, database, subdomain and SSL, isolated in a Kubernetes namespace.
Do I need to know Kubernetes?+
No. Staxa’s dashboard and API let you provision and manage tenants without using kubectl.
What frameworks are supported?+
It auto-detects frameworks such as Next.js, React, Vite, Django, Flask, Rails, Express, NestJS, FastAPI, Go and more, and any Dockerfile-based app.
Is there a free plan?+
Yes. The free sandbox plan includes 2 tenants with up to 2 services each; custom domains require a paid plan.
How are extra tenants priced?+
Extra tenants cost $8 per month on Starter, $7 on Growth, and $5 on Scale.
Summarized by DevHunt from staxa.dev · Oct 23, 2026. Details may change; check the official site.
