Comments
>log in to commentI built Quality.Noted for my own Mac apps and use it before every release. It runs a release-readiness audit and gives you a readiness score out of 100, findings ranked worst first, and one prompt that hands the fixes to Claude Code. On Standard and Thorough audits it first builds your app and runs its tests with your own Xcode tools, then Claude Code checks the code, behavior and release requirements for where you ship. A re-check confirms your fixes in minutes. I'd love to hear what works well and what could be better 😊
- Audits build, tests, static code, functional QA
- Provides readiness score out of 100
- Generates action items for Claude Code
- Re‑check fixes in minutes
- Runs on your own Claude account, no data sent
Quality.Noted runs release-readiness QA audits on macOS apps using your own Claude Code.
- for
- macOS developers who ship to the Mac App Store, Homebrew or direct download.
- pricing
- paid · free trial
- license
- open source
- v27.1.790Quality.Noted 27.1.7904 days ago
Key features
- Readiness Score — Shows a 0-100 score and verdict based on your chosen distribution channel.
- Phased Audits — Quick, Standard, and Thorough audits check code, behavior and release requirements.
- Action Items Prompt — Generates a single prompt with all critical, high and medium findings for Claude Code.
- Re-check — Runs a targeted audit after fixes to confirm issues are resolved in minutes.
- Insights Dashboard — Tracks readiness over time, fix rate and defect hotspots across apps.
- Export Options — Exports audit results as Markdown, HTML or PDF.
Use cases
- Run a quick pre-submission audit to catch critical bugs before App Store review.
- Perform a thorough release audit that validates signing, notarization and Homebrew listing rules.
- Generate actionable fix prompts for Claude Code and verify fixes with an automated re-check.
Quality.Noted vs alternatives
 Quality.Noted |  Semgrep |  Fluent CI |  BuildShip |  Gitea | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Local AI-driven Mac app QA | Static analysis for bugs and security | Custom CI/CD pipelines | AI visual backend creation | Self-hosted Git hosting |
| Pricing | Paid | Subscription | Free | Free | Free |
| DevHunt upvotes | 1 | 0 | 158 | 118 | 0 |
| Launched | Oct 2026 | — | Jan 2024 | Jan 2023 | — |
- Quality.Noted vs Semgrep: Semgrep provides static code analysis only, without release-readiness checks or AI-generated fix prompts.
- Quality.Noted vs Fluent CI: Fluent CI lets you write CI pipelines in TypeScript, but does not perform AI-driven QA audits.
- Quality.Noted vs BuildShip: BuildShip offers AI-powered visual backend building, not focused on macOS app QA or readiness scoring.
- Quality.Noted vs Gitea: Gitea is a self-hosted Git service; it does not audit or fix macOS apps.
Quality.Noted FAQ
Does Quality.Noted change my code?+
No. It only writes audit results to a local folder; fixes are applied only when you paste the generated prompt into Claude Code.
Is my code sent anywhere?+
Quality.Noted never sends your code. Claude Code sends data to Anthropic under your own account, just as when you use Claude directly.
What does a passing score mean?+
A score of 85+ with no open Critical or High findings indicates readiness, but it does not guarantee the app is bug-free.
Can I use the tool on multiple Macs?+
Yes, a single license works on up to two Macs; you can deactivate one Mac to move the license.
What is the refund policy?+
You can request a full refund within 21 days of purchase; the license reverts to the free version.
Summarized by DevHunt from quality.notedsuite.app · Oct 25, 2026. Details may change; check the official site.
