99tests

Real testers run your AI-generated test cases (Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot) on real phones and…

Visit website

One time feeQATestingMobile6 impressionslaunches Oct 271 comment

>log in to comment

99tests[maker]· 7h ago
Unlike typical emulator‑only pipelines, we run AI‑generated test cases on real phones, laptops and browsers with human testers. You upload the cases, pick the devices, and get a detailed pass/fail report with screenshots and exact repro steps in three business days. Let me know what you think about the workflow and pricing.

Real testers run your AI-generated test cases (Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot) on real phones and browsers — a human-verified pass/fail report in 3 days. Your AI wrote the test cases. Now run them on real phones and browsers. Run your AI-generated test cases on real phones, laptops and browsers your users own. Built for teams shipping with AI coding tools. From $129. No account, no sales call. Testers are on it within the hour. Chrome 128 · Windows 11Laptop · 1366×768 · Airtel broadbandSubmitted Pick the devices and browsers your users actually own — Redmi, Samsung, iPhone, Chrome, Safari and more. A human-verified result for every test case you upload — not a summary, but each case marked pass or fail. Each failing case comes with a screenshot showing exactly what the tester saw on the real device.

QA Testing Mobile

Real-device testing on phones, laptops and browsers
Run AI‑generated test cases on real hardware
Verified report with pass/fail per case in 3 business days
Fixed price, no sales call, start within an hour
20,000+ Indian testers covering Android, iOS and browsers

99tests runs AI-generated test cases on real phones, laptops and browsers with human-verified pass/fail reports.

for: Teams using AI code-generation tools that need real-device validation before release.
pricing: paid

works withClaude CodeCursorCopilot

Key features

6 features of 99tests

Upload AI test cases — Accepts CSV, Excel, Markdown, TestRail, Jira and other formats for AI-generated test cases.
Device selection — Choose target phones, browsers and OS versions from a real-tester pool.
Human-run testing — Crowd-sourced testers execute each case manually on actual devices.
Detailed report — Pass/fail per case with screenshots, reproduction steps and device details.
Session credits — Unfilled sessions are credited automatically for future jobs.
Fast turnaround — Report delivered in 3-5 business days, testers on board within an hour.

Use cases

Validate checkout flow on budget Android with aggressive battery management
Verify UI behavior on Safari on macOS laptops
Confirm app works on specific user devices like Redmi 12 or iPhone 11
Re-run the same test suite on a new build to verify fixes

99tests pricing

from 99tests.com ↗

Starter$129USD5 × 45 min sessions · 2 devices/browsers · ~25 test cases · 3 business-day report
Standard$249USD10 × 45 min sessions · 4 devices/browsers · ~50 test cases · 3 business-day report
Deep$449USD20 × 90 min sessions · 6 devices/browsers · ~120 test cases · 5 business-day report

99tests vs alternatives

all alternatives →

	99tests	Cypress	Vitest	Qodo	Postman
Best for	Human-verified real-device test execution	Automated browser end-to-end testing	Unit testing in Vite projects	AI-generated test code creation	API design and testing
Pricing	Paid	Free	Free	Subscription	Subscription
DevHunt upvotes	1	0	0	0	0
Launched	Oct 2026	—	—	—	—

99tests vs Cypress: Cypress runs automated browser tests on virtual environments, not on real devices with human verification.
99tests vs Vitest: Vitest is a fast unit testing framework for Vite projects, not a real-device crowd-testing service.
99tests vs Qodo: Qodo generates AI test code but does not execute them on real devices with human testers.
99tests vs Postman: Postman focuses on API design, testing and documentation, not on UI testing on physical devices.