Ito runs end-to-end tests on every PR, posting video, logs and bug reports directly in GitHub.
- for
- Engineering teams that need automated runtime QA for pull requests.
- pricing
- freemium · free trial
Key features
- Ephemeral sandbox execution — Builds a single-use copy of your app from source for each PR and runs real user flows.
- Full evidence reports — Posts video replays, screenshots, logs and reproduction steps in the PR comment.
- Targeted test plans — Automatically creates test scenarios based on the diff and PR description, no test code required.
- Severity rating & auto-retest — Ranks failures by impact and re-runs tests automatically after a fix is pushed.
- Security-first design — SOC 2 Type II compliant, SSO, audit logs, isolated encrypted test runs with zero data retention.
- Framework-agnostic support — Works with any web stack (React, Vue, Next.js, Rails, Django, etc.).
Use cases
- Validate UI and backend behavior on every PR without writing test scripts.
- Catch runtime-only bugs such as auth, concurrency or data-migration issues before merge.
- Provide video and log evidence for QA engineers to triage regressions quickly.
- Automate regression testing for AI-generated code to prevent hidden exploits.
Ito pricing
- Pro$40/mo/monthUnlimited repositories · 50 code reviews per seat · $1 per extra review · Custom rules & analytics
- Open SourceFreeRuntime analysis on PRs · Video & screenshots · Unlimited public repos · 1-click GitHub install
Ito vs alternatives
 Ito |  Automock |  Octomind |  Quash Bugs |  ReviewPhin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Scriptless PR-based end-to-end testing | Automated unit tests | Low-maintenance E2E testing | Agentic mobile testing | Self-hosted code review |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free | Subscription | Free | Free |
| DevHunt upvotes | 0 | 148 | 26 | 22 | 12 |
| Launched | Jun 2026 | Jan 2023 | Apr 2025 | Jan 2024 | Jul 2026 |
- Ito vs Automock: Automock provides unit-test generation for TypeScript, while Ito runs full end-to-end runtime validation on PRs.
- Ito vs Octomind: Octomind focuses on building and maintaining end-to-end tests, whereas Ito requires no test scripts and runs automatically on each PR.
- Ito vs Quash Bugs: Quash Bugs offers agentic mobile UI/API/DB testing, while Ito targets web app end-to-end testing on pull requests.
- Ito vs ReviewPhin: ReviewPhin is a self-hosted code-review agent for GitLab/GitHub, whereas Ito provides hosted execution-based QA with video evidence.
Ito FAQ
What is Ito?+
Ito is a code-review tool that runs execution-based behavioral tests on every pull request and posts a full runtime report in the PR.
How does Ito test pull requests?+
It deploys your app in an isolated sandbox, uses computer-use agents to navigate the UI and exercise backend logic, then records video, logs and steps.
Does Ito store my source code?+
No, the code runs in a single-use sandbox and is not retained; Ito is SOC 2 Type II compliant.
How long does setup take?+
Connect your GitHub repo and Ito begins testing within minutes, with the first PR result typically in about 60 minutes.
Do I need to write tests?+
No, Ito generates test cases automatically; you can optionally add plain-English instructions to prioritize scenarios.
What does the report include?+
Each PR comment contains a video replay, screenshots, exact code lines, severity rating, reproduction steps and a fix prompt.
Summarized by DevHunt from ito.ai · Sep 29, 2026. Details may change; check the official site.
