Compare
Cypress vs Playwright
Playwright is also a browser-based e2e tester but focuses on cross-browser automation via its own test runner, whereas Cypress runs inside the browser with built-in time-
Which to pick
Pick Cypress if you want…
- Browser-based end-to-end testing
- Browser testing without AI agent features
- Integrations with Docker, Slack or GitHub (on Cypress' list, not Playwright's)
Pick Playwright if you want…
- Cross-browser testing with AI agent support
- Cross-browser e2e testing
- A free, open-source tool
- Integrations with Python, .NET or Java (on Playwright's list, not Cypress')
Cypress focuses on browser testing but lacks built-in AI agent integrations and MCP support.
Side by side
- What it is
- Cypress:Cypress is an open-source testing tool that runs end-to-end and component tests directly in the browser and integrates with CI pipelines.
- Playwright:Playwright provides end-to-end web automation and testing for modern apps, scripts, and AI agents.
- Best for
- Cypress:Browser-based end-to-end testing
- Playwright:Cross-browser testing with AI agent support
- Who it’s for
- Cypress:Front-end developers and QA engineers building web applications
- Playwright:Developers and QA engineers building reliable web tests and AI-driven browser automation.
- Pricing
- Cypress:Freemium
- Playwright:Open source
- Plans
- Cypress:Starter (Free) $0 · Team $67 per month (billed annually $79 · Business $267 per month (billed annually $3,
- Playwright:—
- Open source
- Cypress:Yes, 51,048 GitHub stars
- Playwright:Yes, 96,964 GitHub stars
- Works with
- Cypress:Docker, Slack, GitHub, GitLab, JIRA
- Playwright:Python, .NET, Java, Chromium, Firefox, WebKit, VS Code, Claude Code
Cypress features
- Real-time test runner. Runs tests in the actual browser, letting you see actions as they happen and debug with DevTools.
- Cypress Studio. Record interactions or describe flows in natural language to generate test code automatically.
- AI-powered debugging. Provides visual test replay and AI summaries to quickly understand failures.
- Flake detection. Identifies intermittent tests and surfaces flaky-test analytics.
- Parallelization & load balancing. Distributes test runs across multiple machines for faster CI feedback.
- UI coverage & accessibility checks. Shows UI test coverage and flags accessibility violations without extra code.
- Integrations with workflow tools. Native integrations with Slack, Teams, GitHub, GitLab, JIRA, webhooks and CI/CD.
- Cypress Cloud analytics. Tracks test suite health, trends, and provides project analytics dashboards.
Playwright features
- Auto-wait & assertions. Automatically waits for elements to be actionable and retries assertions until they pass.
- Test isolation. Each test runs in a fresh browser context, giving near-zero overhead isolation.
- Parallelism & sharding. Runs tests in parallel across browsers and can shard across machines for faster CI.
- MCP server for AI agents. Model Context Protocol server gives AI agents full browser control via structured accessibility snapshots.
- CLI for coding agents. Token-efficient command-line interface with installable skills for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, etc.
- Test generator & trace viewer. Record actions to generate test code and view detailed execution traces with DOM, network, and console logs.
- VS Code extension. Run, debug, generate tests and view traces directly inside the editor.
Cypress vs Playwright FAQ
Is Cypress or Playwright free?+
Cypress has a free plan (Starter (Free)) and paid plans. Playwright is free and open source.
Is Cypress or Playwright open source?+
Yes, both are open source: Cypress (cypress-io/cypress on GitHub, MIT license) and Playwright (microsoft/playwright on GitHub, Apache-2.0 license).
Do Cypress and Playwright integrate with the same tools?+
Their integration lists don't overlap: Cypress lists Docker, Slack, GitHub, GitLab and 1 more; Playwright lists Python, .NET, Java, Chromium and 5 more.
On DevHunt
Based on each tool's website and DevHunt data. Details may change; check the official sites.