Compare

Beeceptor vs Test-proxy-recorder

Provides mock API endpoints but requires you to define mocks manually.

Which to pick

Pick Beeceptor if you want…

  • AI-powered mock servers
  • Quick mock API deployment
  • Integrations with GraphQL, gRPC or SOAP (on Beeceptor's list, not Test-proxy-recorder's)

Pick Test-proxy-recorder if you want…

  • Playwright VCR for SSR, browser and WebSocket traffic
  • A free, open-source tool
  • Integrations with Playwright, Next.js or TanStack Start (on Test-proxy-recorder's list, not Beeceptor's)

Side by side

What it is
Beeceptor:Beeceptor provides instant mock API servers with AI-generated data, request inspection, and proxy recording.
Test-proxy-recorder:Records real API responses during Playwright runs and replays them deterministically on CI.
Best for
Beeceptor:AI-powered mock servers
Test-proxy-recorder:Playwright VCR for SSR, browser and WebSocket traffic
Who it’s for
Beeceptor:Developers and QA teams needing fast API mocking and debugging.
Test-proxy-recorder:Playwright users needing deterministic E2E tests for full-stack apps.
Pricing
Beeceptor:Freemium
Test-proxy-recorder:Open source
Plans
Beeceptor:Free $0/month · Individual $10/month per month · Team $25/month per month · Scale $99/month per month
Test-proxy-recorder:—
Open source
Beeceptor:—
Test-proxy-recorder:Yes, 112 GitHub stars
Works with
Beeceptor:GraphQL, gRPC, SOAP, CI/CD pipelines
Test-proxy-recorder:Playwright, Next.js, TanStack Start, Chrome extensions

Beeceptor features

  • AI-generated mock from specs. Upload OpenAPI/Swagger, GraphQL, gRPC or SOAP and get a fully functional mock server with realistic data.
  • No-code request matching. Create dynamic and conditional responses via an intuitive UI without writing code.
  • Live request inspection. View payloads, headers and details in real time for debugging webhooks and callbacks.
  • Proxy & record. Route traffic through a live backend, record it and switch to mock mode when needed.
  • Stateful mock servers. Define multi-step behavior, delays, timeouts and CRUD routes with built-in storage.
  • Local tunnel. Expose third-party event payloads to your local machine on a specific port.
  • CI/CD integration. Programmatically control mock behavior and integrate into pipelines (Team and Scale plans).
  • Custom domain & mTLS. Use your own domain and certificate-based authentication for private mock endpoints (Team/Scale).

Test-proxy-recorder features

  • Record real traffic. Captures byte-for-byte API responses while tests run locally.
  • Replay from disk. Serves recorded responses on CI with no network calls.
  • SSR and browser support. Works for Next.js/TanStack Start server-side fetches and client-side fetches.
  • WebSocket handling. Records and replays WebSocket messages during tests.
  • Playwright native integration. Provides fixtures and hooks that plug directly into Playwright.
  • Auth provider passthrough. Keeps real auth (Cognito, Auth0, etc.) live while mocking only the app API.

Beeceptor vs Test-proxy-recorder FAQ

Is Beeceptor or Test-proxy-recorder free?+

Beeceptor has a free plan; paid plans start at $10/month (Individual). Test-proxy-recorder is free and open source.

Which is cheaper, Beeceptor or Test-proxy-recorder?+

Test-proxy-recorder is free, so it costs less. Beeceptor starts at $10/month (Individual).

Is Beeceptor or Test-proxy-recorder open source?+

Test-proxy-recorder is open source (asmyshlyaev177/test-proxy-recorder on GitHub, MIT license). DevHunt has no public source repository on record for Beeceptor.

Do Beeceptor and Test-proxy-recorder integrate with the same tools?+

Their integration lists don't overlap: Beeceptor lists GraphQL, gRPC, SOAP and CI/CD pipelines; Test-proxy-recorder lists Playwright, Next.js, TanStack Start and Chrome extensions.

On DevHunt

Beeceptor

4 upvotes · Launched on DevHunt on Apr 23, 2024

Test-proxy-recorder

1 upvote · Launching on DevHunt on Oct 3, 2028

Based on each tool's website and DevHunt data. Details may change; check the official sites.