Compare
Augment Code vs Conductor
Short answer: Pick Augment Code if you want end-to-end AI-orchestrated software factories; pick Conductor if you want collaborative AI coding agents. Augment Code starts at $20/month.
ConductorRun a team of coding agents in the cloudWhich to pick
Pick Augment Code if you want…
- End-to-end AI-orchestrated software factories
- Single-agent code assistance
- Integrations with GitHub, GitLab or Slack (on Augment Code's list, not Conductor's)
Pick Conductor if you want…
- Collaborative AI coding agents
- Integrations with Claude Code, Codex or Cursor (on Conductor's list, not Augment Code's)
Side by side
- What it is
- Augment Code:Augment Code’s Cosmos platform orchestrates AI agents across the software delivery lifecycle, providing automated code review, ticket-to-PR, vulnerability remediation, and incident response.
- Conductor:Conductor runs multiple coding agents in isolated cloud sandboxes for collaborative development.
- Best for
- Augment Code:End-to-end AI-orchestrated software factories
- Conductor:Collaborative AI coding agents
- Who it’s for
- Augment Code:Engineering teams that want AI-driven automation for the entire SDLC
- Conductor:Developers and teams needing AI coding assistants in a shared cloud environment.
- Pricing
- Augment Code:Paid
- Conductor:Subscription
- Starting price
- Augment Code:$20/month (Standard)
- Conductor:—
- Plans
- Augment Code:Standard $20/month per month · Business $100/month per month
- Conductor:—
- Works with
- Augment Code:GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear, Jira
- Conductor:Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, macOS, iOS, Conductor API
Augment Code features
- AI-Powered Code Review. Agents perform a substantive first-pass review of every PR within minutes, surfacing intent, architecture, and security issues.
- Ticket-to-PR Automation. Assign a ticket and the loop writes, tests, and merges the change end-to-end.
- Vulnerability Remediation. Agents map CVE blast radius and generate reviewed fixes without a war-room.
- Incident Response Coordination. Agents investigate alerts, draft timelines, and assemble context before on-call engineers join.
- Context Engine. Provides deep codebase understanding and shared memory across runs and agents.
- Native Integrations. Triggers for GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear, Jira and custom webhooks.
Conductor features
- Multiplayer workspaces. Share a workspace link, see teammates' activity, and prompt agents together in real-time.
- Isolated cloud sandboxes. Each agent runs on a Firecracker microVM with repo and dependencies pre-installed, spinning up in seconds.
- First-party agent support. Runs Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and OpenCode agents out of the box.
- Cross-platform access. Use Conductor via desktop app, mobile (macOS, iOS) or custom integrations through the API.
- Bring-your-own keys. Connect your own subscriptions and API keys for supported agents.
- Rapid sandbox snapshots. Create and restore repository snapshots instantly for fast iteration.
Augment Code vs Conductor FAQ
What is the difference between Augment Code and Conductor?+
Augment Code offers a single AI coding agent with deep codebase context, not a multi-agent cloud platform.
Should I use Augment Code or Conductor?+
Pick Augment Code if you want end-to-end AI-orchestrated software factories, single-agent code assistance or integrations with GitHub, GitLab or Slack (on Augment Code's list, not Conductor's). Pick Conductor if you want collaborative AI coding agents or integrations with Claude Code, Codex or Cursor (on Conductor's list, not Augment Code's).
Is Augment Code or Conductor free?+
Augment Code is paid, from $20/month (Standard). Conductor is listed on DevHunt as a paid subscription.
Do Augment Code and Conductor integrate with the same tools?+
Their integration lists don't overlap: Augment Code lists GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear and 1 more; Conductor lists Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode and 3 more.
On DevHunt
Based on each tool's website and DevHunt data. Details may change; check the official sites.