Compare
Fluent CI vs rx.run
Short answer: Pick Fluent CI if you want TypeScript-based CI pipelines; pick rx.run if you want instant cloud functions from the editor. Fluent CI is free and open source; rx.run is free.
Fluent CIWrite your CI/CD Pipelines in Typescript! No YAML
rx.runDeploy any function to the cloud instantly as you save it in your editor.Which to pick
Pick Fluent CI if you want…
- TypeScript-based CI pipelines
- Open-source code (fluentci-io/fluentci on GitHub, MPL-2.0 license)
- Integrations with Deno, Gleam or Rescript (on Fluent CI's list, not rx.run's)
Pick rx.run if you want…
- Instant cloud functions from the editor
- Integrations with TypeScript (on rx.run's list, not Fluent CI's)
Side by side
- What it is
- Fluent CI:Fluent CI lets you write CI/CD pipelines in TypeScript instead of YAML.
- rx.run:rx.run is a lightweight CLI and runtime that instantly deploys any function to the cloud as you save it in your editor.
- Best for
- Fluent CI:TypeScript-based CI pipelines
- rx.run:Instant cloud functions from the editor
- Who it’s for
- Fluent CI:Developers who prefer a real programming language for CI/CD pipelines.
- rx.run:Developers who want fast, code-first serverless deployments, especially TypeScript users.
- Pricing
- Fluent CI:Open source
- rx.run:Free
- Starting price
- Fluent CI:Free
- rx.run:—
- Free plan or trial
- Fluent CI:Free to use
- rx.run:—
- Open source
- Fluent CI:Yes, 122 GitHub stars
- rx.run:—
- Works with
- Fluent CI:Deno, Gleam, Rescript, Rust, Bun, Cloudflare, Terraform, Android
- rx.run:TypeScript
Fluent CI features
- TypeScript pipelines. Define build, test, and deploy steps using TypeScript code.
- Self-hosted. Run Fluent CI locally or on any server you control.
- FluentCI Studio. Graphical UI to explore and edit pipelines across projects.
- Plugin SDK. Write custom CI plugins with IDE auto-completion and type checking.
- 170+ extensions. Ready-made pipelines for many languages and services.
- Dagger & Deno core. Built on Dagger for portable pipelines and Deno for secure execution.
- Registry of pre-built pipelines. Browse and reuse community pipelines for common stacks.
- CI provider integration. Develop locally then push pipelines to any CI provider.
rx.run features
- Instant Deploy on Save. Automatically deploys a function to the cloud each time you save it in your editor.
- Zero-Config Infra. Sets up all required cloud infrastructure without manual configuration.
- Built-in Services. Provides secrets, storage, authentication, payments and more out of the box.
- CLI Runtime. Offers a simple command-line interface to manage and run deployed functions.
Fluent CI vs rx.run FAQ
What is the difference between Fluent CI and rx.run?+
Fluent CI focuses on CI/CD pipelines in TypeScript, not instant function deployment.
Should I use Fluent CI or rx.run?+
Pick Fluent CI if you want TypeScript-based CI pipelines, open-source code (fluentci-io/fluentci on GitHub, MPL-2.0 license) or integrations with Deno, Gleam or Rescript (on Fluent CI's list, not rx.run's). Pick rx.run if you want instant cloud functions from the editor or integrations with TypeScript (on rx.run's list, not Fluent CI's).
Is Fluent CI or rx.run free?+
Fluent CI is free and open source. rx.run is listed as free on DevHunt.
Is Fluent CI or rx.run open source?+
Fluent CI is open source (fluentci-io/fluentci on GitHub, MPL-2.0 license). DevHunt has no public source repository on record for rx.run.
Do Fluent CI and rx.run integrate with the same tools?+
Their integration lists don't overlap: Fluent CI lists Deno, Gleam, Rescript, Rust and 10 more; rx.run lists TypeScript.
On DevHunt
Fluent CI
158 upvotes · Launched on DevHunt on Jan 9, 2024
Based on each tool's website and DevHunt data. Details may change; check the official sites.