Compare
Fine vs Waxell
Fine focuses on building software with AI agents but lacks the comprehensive governance and observability layer Waxell provides.
Side by side
- What it is
- Fine:Build Software with AI Agents.
- Waxell:Waxell provides observability and governance for AI agents in production, enforcing policies, detecting PII, and controlling costs.
- Best for
- Fine:Agent-centric development platform
- Waxell:Real-time AI agent governance
- Who it’s for
- Fine:—
- Waxell:Engineering and security teams deploying AI agents at scale
- Pricing
- Fine:Free
- Waxell:Freemium
- Plans
- Fine:—
- Waxell:Free $0 · Team $49 per month · Business $499 per month
- Works with
- Fine:—
- Waxell:Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, LangChain, CrewAI
- DevHunt upvotes
- Fine:75
- Waxell:1
- Launched on DevHunt
- Fine:Jan 2023
- Waxell:Mar 2026
Waxell features
- Observe. Captures every LLM call, tool invocation and agent decision with real-time PII redaction and budget enforcement.
- Connect. Zero-code integration for third-party agents and MCP tools with policy checks and rug-pull detection.
- Gateway. Single governed endpoint that fingerprints MCP tools, applies policies and audits every tool call.
- Endpoints. Discovers AI apps on devices via TLS handshake metadata without decrypting traffic.
- Runtime. Durable managed execution with pause, resume, replay, lineage graph and kill-switches.
- Auto-instrumentation. 200+ libraries auto-instrumented with OpenTelemetry-native SDK, two-line setup.
Based on each tool's website and DevHunt data. Details may change; check the official sites.