HomeBlogDevelopmentTools
Published Jan 17, 2024 ⦁ 18 min read
Comparing Popular OSS Database Systems

Comparing Popular OSS Database Systems

Selecting the right open source database is crucial, yet most comparisons only scratch the surface.

In this post, you'll get an in-depth analysis of the most popular OSS databases - from PostgreSQL and MySQL to MongoDB and Cassandra.

We'll compare features, performance, use cases and more to help you determine the best open source database for your needs.

Introduction to Open Source Database Systems

Open source databases provide developers with free and customizable database management systems. By removing licensing fees, oss databases enable teams to allocate more resources towards core product development. However, open source does not mean limitation - many oss databases match or exceed the capabilities of proprietary databases. This article explores the most popular options to fit various data and workload requirements.

Understanding OSS Databases

Open source databases provide the full database software stack under an open source license. This allows developers to freely access, modify, and distribute database code.

Benefits include:

  • Eliminates licensing fees
  • Customizable to specific needs
  • Transparent processes
  • Strong community support

Considerations when selecting an open source database:

  • Features needed (relational vs NoSQL)
  • Performance benchmarks
  • Community activity level
  • Available support options

Open Source Database List: A Primer

There are many open source database options available. The most popular relational and NoSQL databases include:

Relational

  • MySQL
  • PostgreSQL
  • MariaDB

NoSQL

  • MongoDB
  • Apache Cassandra
  • Redis

Each database has strengths and limitations depending on the architecture, data model, and use case.

Features and Performance Metrics

When evaluating open source databases, key criteria include:

  • Query Performance: Speed of common operations like inserts, updates, and complex queries. Measured in queries per second.
  • Scalability: Ability to manage large datasets and traffic across clusters.
  • Availability: Uptime percentage and data durability guarantees.
  • Community Support: Number of contributors and available troubleshooting guides.

Selecting the Best Open Source Database

There is no universally "best" open source database. The ideal option depends on:

  • Data Model: Relational vs key-value vs document model
  • Workload Patterns: Read/write splits and transactions
  • Scalability Needs: Growth expectations
  • Cloud vs On-Prem: Environment constraints
  • Internal Expertise: Admin skill sets

Matching database architecture with application requirements ensures maximum performance, scalability, and ease of use.

What is OSS database?

Open source databases (OSS databases) are database management systems that are released under an open source license. This allows the source code to be freely used, modified, and distributed. Some of the most popular OSS databases include:

  • MySQL - A relational database that is a popular open source alternative to commercial databases like Oracle. MySQL is used by many well-known companies and websites. It offers features like replication and sharding for scaling databases.
  • PostgreSQL - An object-relational database with a strong reputation for reliability, feature robustness, and performance. It supports complex SQL queries and handling large volumes of data. PostgreSQL has native JSON support and multi-version concurrency control.
  • MariaDB - A community-developed fork of MySQL intended to remain free under the GNU GPL. It ensures continued open development of MySQL thanks to its vibrant developer community. MariaDB aims to maintain high compatibility with MySQL.
  • MongoDB - A popular document-oriented NoSQL database. Instead of using tables and rows like a relational DB, MongoDB stores data in flexible JSON-like documents with dynamic schemas. It is designed to scale easily in distributed systems and handle large volumes of unstructured data.
  • Redis - An in-memory key-value data store known for high performance, replication capabilities and flexibility. It is often used for caching, message brokering, gaming leaderboards, and real-time analytics. Data persists on disk as well.

When evaluating OSS databases, some key factors to consider are features, performance, community support, documentation quality, ease of use, scalability needs, and compatibility with existing infrastructure. The use case will determine if a relational, NoSQL, in-memory, graph, time series or other database type makes the most sense. Many organizations use a combination of databases.

What is open source database example?

Open source databases are database management systems that are available with publicly accessible source code. Some popular examples of open source databases include:

MySQL

MySQL is one of the most popular open source relational databases. It is used by many well-known companies and websites including Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and more. MySQL offers features like:

  • Relational database structure
  • Support for complex SQL queries
  • Transactions and ACID compliance
  • High performance and scalability
  • Replication and sharding capabilities

MySQL is a great general purpose database for web and mobile applications. It works well for most use cases and is easy to get started with.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced open source database that offers enterprise-grade capabilities. Some of its standout features include:

  • Fully ACID compliant for reliability
  • Sophisticated concurrency control
  • Extensive SQL support and stored procedures
  • High extensibility with user-defined functions
  • Spatial/GIS, JSON, and other advanced data types

PostgreSQL excels for applications that require stability, correctness, and rigid SQL standards compliance. It's great for financial, geospatial, analytics, and scientific applications.

MongoDB

MongoDB is a popular document-based NoSQL database. Instead of the traditional table structure used in relational databases, MongoDB stores data in flexible JSON-like documents. Key advantages include:

  • Dynamic schemas
  • Tunable consistency models
  • Auto-sharding for horizontal scaling
  • Indexing and aggregation functions
  • Fully managed cloud offerings

MongoDB works extremely well for modern applications that need to store unstructured or rapidly changing data. Example use cases include content management, real-time analytics, and IoT data storage.

MySQL is the most popular open source database, used by many major websites and applications. Here is a comparison of some key open source database options:

MySQL

  • Most popular open source database
  • Relational database management system
  • Used by companies like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube
  • Handles high volume web and data workloads
  • Features like replication, sharding for scalability
  • Supports transactions, referential integrity
  • Easy to get started for new applications

PostgreSQL

  • Second most popular open source database
  • Focus on extensibility and standards compliance
  • Used by companies like Apple, Fujitsu, IMDB
  • Advanced features like views, triggers, nested transactions
  • Known for reliability and data integrity
  • Slower performance than MySQL for high throughput web apps

MongoDB

  • Leading NoSQL document database
  • Flexible schema design, no complex SQL queries
  • Used by companies like eBay, Forbes, UPS
  • Scales horizontally with automatic sharding
  • Fast read/write performance, good for real-time apps
  • Lacks capabilities like joins, transactions

Based on popularity and adoption, MySQL seems to be the leading open source database option currently. However, databases like PostgreSQL and MongoDB also have strong followings and use cases. The best database depends on the specific needs of the application.

What is the world's most advanced open source database?

PostgreSQL is considered by many to be the most advanced open source relational database system available today. Here's a quick overview of some of its standout features:

Reliability and Robustness

  • Over 35 years of active development has made PostgreSQL incredibly reliable and robust. It powers many large applications and handles complex workloads while maintaining stability.
  • PostgreSQL has very strong ACID compliance for transactional integrity and data consistency.
  • It also offers advanced disaster recovery through streaming replication, continuous archiving, point-in-time recovery, and built-in connection pooling.

Performance

  • PostgreSQL performance competes well with top commercial databases due to its sophisticated query optimizer and ability to handle high-concurrency workloads.
  • It can be tuned and optimized significantly through configuration tweaks, indexes, caching, partitioning, parallelization, and more.
  • Benchmarks typically place it on par with Oracle and SQL Server for transactional performance. It's faster than MySQL for complex queries.

Features

  • As an object-relational database, PostgreSQL offers many advanced data types like arrays, hstore, JSON/JSONB, and custom types.
  • Other features include table inheritance, sophisticated locking, foreign data wrappers, updatable views, triggers, event triggers, and partial indexes.

So in summary, PostgreSQL's reliability, robustness, performance and breadth of features make it a top choice for many demanding database workloads. The fact that it's open source and avoids vendor lock-in makes it very appealing for a wide range of applications.

sbb-itb-b2281d3

Open-source relational databases provide powerful functionality for storing and managing structured data, without the licensing costs of proprietary options. This section explores some of the most widely-used open-source relational databases, including PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MariaDB.

PostgreSQL: The Advanced Open Source Relational Database

PostgreSQL is considered one of the most advanced open-source relational databases. Key features include:

  • Full SQL compliance and extensibility: Supports complex SQL queries, triggers, views, transactions and stored procedures. Extensible through custom data types, functions, operators and indexes.
  • High performance: Uses sophisticated query optimization and indexing techniques for fast data retrieval and throughput. Benchmarks very competitively against leading commercial databases.
  • Robust reliability: Uses Write-Ahead Logging for crash recovery. Point-in-time recovery allows restoring database state to a previous timestamp.
  • Replication and high availability: Asynchronous and synchronous replication supported for scaling reads and achieving high availability. Failover handled smoothly.

With its enterprise-grade capabilities and active development community, PostgreSQL excels for applications needing an advanced, trustworthy open-source relational database. It's a great fit for web/mobile apps, analytics, scientific data and more.

MySQL: The Ubiquitous Open Source Database

MySQL is the world's most popular open-source database, powering millions of websites and applications. Key advantages include:

  • Ease of use and setup: Streamlined install and configuration. Many web hosts provide managed MySQL hosting services. Intuitive SQL syntax.
  • High performance at scale: Uses indexing, caching and optimization techniques for fast queries and throughput. Handles heavy workloads and spikes in traffic.
  • Wide language and platform support: APIs available for most programming languages. Runs on all major operating systems.

The simplicity, scalability and ubiquity of MySQL has made it the go-to open-source DBMS for web and cloud-based apps. It excels for high-traffic sites like Facebook and Twitter.

MariaDB: A Community-Driven MySQL Fork

MariaDB is an open-source database that builds upon and enhances MySQL. Key features include:

  • Drop-in replacement: 100% compatible database API and client libraries allows easy migration from MySQL.
  • Improved performance: Faster queries, read scalability and throughput than MySQL in benchmarks.
  • New storage engines: Adds temporal data processing, faster transactions and enhanced querying functionality.

With strong community development, MariaDB gives the flexibility to modernize key components of MySQL, making it appealing to developers needing MySQL's ubiquity plus next-gen capabilities.

Examining NoSQL OSS Databases

This section explores some of the most popular open-source NoSQL databases and their key strengths and use cases.

MongoDB: A Document-Oriented Leader

MongoDB is one of the most widely-used document-oriented databases. Some key features include:

  • Document data model - Stores data in flexible JSON-like documents rather than rows and columns
  • Rich querying and indexing - Supports dynamic queries on documents using an expressive querying language and secondary indexes
  • Tunable consistency - Balances strong consistency with high availability depending on application needs
  • Horizontal scalability - Scales out with automatic sharding across commodity servers

With its flexible schema and powerful querying, MongoDB is great for building modern applications where requirements evolve quickly. It's used by companies like eBay, Cisco, and HSBC.

Redis: More Than Just a Database for Caching

Although often used for caching, Redis has many versatile data structures well-suited for:

  • Caching - Provides fast in-memory key-value storage to reduce load off databases
  • Session management - Handles user sessions directly in Redis rather than databases
  • Real-time analytics - Supports atomic operations on data structures like sorted sets and streams

Its high performance and versatility make Redis a popular choice as a database, cache, and message broker. Major companies using it include Twitter, GitHub, and Snapchat.

Apache Cassandra: Scalability and Resilience

Optimized for high scalability and resilience, Cassandra has features like:

  • Distributed architecture - Runs on commodity hardware with no single point of failure
  • Automatic replication - Copies data to multiple nodes for fault tolerance
  • Tunable consistency - Trades off consistency for availability based on needs
  • Linear scalability - Expands easily by adding nodes without downtime

With a strong focus on availability and scalability, Cassandra powers massive datasets at companies like Apple, Netflix, and eBay.

CouchDB: Seamless Data Sync

With its synchronization capabilities, CouchDB excels when offline use is needed:

  • Document data model - Like MongoDB, stores flexible JSON documents
  • Bidirectional replication - Syncs data between nodes with automatic conflict resolution
  • Offline-first - Supports disconnected use with intermittent connectivity
  • JSON query language - Allows CRUD operations and queries against documents

CouchDB is great for occasionally connected applications. It's used by companies like BBC and Cloudant.

Open Source Database vs Commercial Database

Open source databases offer some key advantages over their commercial counterparts that make them attractive options for many applications. However, commercial databases also have benefits that suit certain use cases. Here is an analysis of some of the key differences.

Cost and Licensing Considerations

One of the biggest advantages of open source databases is no licensing fees. With commercial databases, you need to pay substantial fees to use them, especially as data volumes and usage increases. Open source options like MySQL, PostgreSQL, and MongoDB can be used without any license costs even for large scale deployments.

However, while open source database software itself if free, there can still be costs for enterprise-grade support, maintenance, tuning, etc. So total cost of ownership should be evaluated case-by-case.

Open source licensing also allows modifying and redistributing the code. This allows greater customization and community innovation as discussed below.

Community Support and Innovation

Open source communities actively maintain, improve, patch and extend oss database projects. Bugs can be identified and fixed quickly. New features, optimizations, and interfaces can be introduced to meet evolving needs.

The open source model encourages decentralized innovation. Anyone can contribute ideas and code. This creates diverse perspectives and rapid progress.

However, quality of community support can vary across projects and not all open source projects have vibrant communities behind them. Critical issues may take longer to resolve unless paying for commercial support.

Customization and Flexibility

The ability to directly modify open source code allows adapting databases for specific use cases - e.g. tuning for performance, scaling, availability, etc. Open source licensing facilitates such customization.

Commercial databases are largely black boxes that can't be changed internally. They offer less flexibility for exotic use cases. The available customization hooks may not meet specialized needs.

So for applications that require fine-grained customization, open source provides more options. But for more standardized use cases, commercial databases work well out-of-the-box.

Security and Reliability

Reputable commercial databases often have better resources for security, testing, and quality control. Lengthy vendor QA processes check for bugs and build reliable software. Timely fixes and updates are provided for critical flaws.

For open source, project communities may not have as much bandwidth for rigorous testing. Bugs can persist for longer before being discovered and fixed. However, recent improvements in oss database security and stability has narrowed some of these gaps.

So for mission-critical systems needing rock-solid reliability, commercial databases are favored. But open source options can now satisfy many common reliability requirements at lower cost.

In summary, open source and commercial databases each have pros and cons to weigh based on budget, use case flexibility, innovation needs and reliability expectations. The optimal choice depends on balancing these factors for a given application.

Key Differences Between SQL and NoSQL

SQL and NoSQL databases have fundamentally different data models, query languages, relationships, and more. Choosing between them depends on the application's needs.

Data Structure and Storage Models

SQL databases use fixed schemas and tabular relations to represent data. This provides structure and ensures integrity through ACID transactions. However, it reduces flexibility.

NoSQL databases use dynamic schemas based on documents, key-value pairs, graphs, and column families. This provides flexibility and scalability. However, it sacrifices some structure and integrity features.

For example, MongoDB stores JSON-like documents that can have varied fields, while Redis stores simple key-value pairs.

Handling Relationships and Data Complexity

SQL databases excel at handling complexity through foreign key constraints and JOINs across tables. This allows efficient modeling of relationships.

NoSQL databases denormalize data, embedding related data in a single document or entity. Some NoSQL stores like Neo4j have native graph structures to model relationships.

This trades off simplicity and scalability for efficient and complex queries across data.

Transaction Management and Consistency

SQL provides ACID compliance with commit, rollback, and isolation. This ensures strong data consistency and integrity.

Many NoSQL databases focus on high scalability and availability using eventual consistency models. They often lack true ACID transactions, sacrificing absolute data integrity for performance.

For example, MongoDB has atomic operations on single documents only.

Reporting and Analytics Capabilities

SQL's standardized language and strong aggregates support allow efficient analytical and reporting queries for business intelligence needs.

NoSQL query languages are often proprietary and less mature for analytics. Some databases like MongoDB are improving this via connectors to analytics engines.

In summary, SQL excels at complex querying, relationships, and integrity whereas NoSQL excels at flexibility, scalability and high performance. The application's specific data and use case should inform the choice between these database models.

Best OSS Databases Per Use Case

Web and Mobile Applications

For web and mobile applications, MySQL and PostgreSQL provide a good balance of performance, features, and ease of use. Both are mature open source relational databases with rich ecosystems.

Some key advantages:

  • Replication and sharding capabilities for scaling reads and writes
  • JSON support for flexible schemas
  • Extensive 3rd party libraries and integrations

MongoDB is a popular choice for highly interactive web apps due to its horizontal scalability and flexible documents schema. However, it lacks some relational features like joins and transactions.

For mobile apps, CouchDB and PostgreSQL both provide built-in replication abilities for syncing data across devices.

High-Volume Analytics Platforms

For analytics pipelines and data warehouses, PostgreSQL and MySQL are common choices due to their maturity, reliability and SQL compliance.

Cassandra is purpose-built for big data use cases. It scales linearly with no single point of failure. However, its query language (CQL) lacks full SQL support.

Real-Time Applications and Caching

Redis excels as a database for caching and real-time apps due to its exceptional performance. It offers:

  • Sub-millisecond response times
  • Built-in data structures like sorted sets and streams
  • Pub/sub messaging for real-time updates

The tradeoff is Redis only stores data in memory, lacking persistence. It's often used with a secondary database for storage.

Content Management Systems

For content management systems (CMS), MySQL and PostgreSQL allow blending performance, standards support, and rich features.

Advantages include:

  • Mature ecosystems with many integrations
  • Advanced permission controls
  • JSON support

NoSQL databases generally lack the maturity and permissions needed for enterprise CMS use cases.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

We summarize the essential points covered across SQL and NoSQL open-source databases and their pertinent capabilities by use case to inform your selection.

Recap of Open Source Database Options

The most popular open source databases discussed each have their own strengths:

  • MySQL is a relational database that is easy to use and integrate. It works well for most web applications.
  • PostgreSQL is an advanced relational database with a strong reputation for reliability and robustness. It handles complex queries and analytics well.
  • MongoDB is a document-based NoSQL database optimized for scalability and flexibility. It works great for modern applications with diverse, unstructured data.
  • Redis is an in-memory key-value store known for blazing fast performance. It excels at caching, message brokering, and real-time apps.

When selecting an open source database, consider your application's data model, query complexity, scalability needs, and performance requirements.

Final Thoughts on Selecting an OSS Database

Choosing the right open source database is crucial for building efficient data-driven applications. Consider both the strengths of the database technology and your specific use case constraints and goals.

The vibrant open source communities behind databases like PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and Redis also provide helpful resources for implementation, management, and optimization. Their collaborative development models enable rapid innovation.

Evaluating both SQL and NoSQL options allows you to select the best database for your needs rather than forcing a one-size-fits-all approach. Keep an open mind, do your homework, and choose the open source database that aligns with your project requirements.

Database ManagementNoSQL DatabasesRelational Databases

Related posts